-
|
- Subramaniam Chandrashekhar
-
(contributed by Vivek Penumatcha)
Born: Lahore, India; October 19, 1910
Nobel Prizetheoretical work on stars and their : 1983
Physics Nobel prize for his evolution
Nationality: American
Biography Subramaniam
Chandrashekhar was born on October 19, 1910 in Lahore, India
( later part of Pakistan ). At the time of Chandrashekhar's birth,
his father, Chandrashekhar Subramaniam Ayyar, was an officer
in the Department of Audits and Accounts of Indian Government
Services. He was the third of ten children ( four sons and six
daughters, Chandrashekhar was the first son). Chandrashekhar's
mother, Sita Balakrishnan, was a devoted to her children and
instilled in them a sense of great ambition from an early age.
Chandrashekhar received his elementary education from his parents
and private tutors when he was in Lahore. In 1918 his father
was transferred to Madras ( renamed Chennai recently ) where
the family made their permanent home. In Madras, Chandrashekhar
attended the Hindu High School from 1922 to 1925 where he finished
his secondary school education with honors. He then attend Presidency
College from 1925 to 1930, following in the footsteps of his
famous uncle, Sir C. V. Raman, discoverer of Raman effect and
the Nobel laureate in physics for the year 1930. He received
his bachelor of science degree (in physics), with honors, in1930.
Because of his academic achievements, Chandrashekhar was awarded
a scholarship by the government of India to attend graduate school
at the University of Cambridge, England. At Cambridge he became
a research student of R. H. Fowler and got his doctorate in 1933.
During this time he spent a year studying at the Institut for
Teorestik Fysik, in Copenhagen, Denmark. Soon after receiving
his doctorate, Chandrashekhar was awarded the Prize Fellowship
at Trinity College, Cambridge. He stayed in this position until
1937. During this time Chandrashekhar married Lalitha Doriswamy,
whom he had met in college, in September of 1936. While at Trinity,
Chandrashekhar met and formed lasting friendships with prominent
astrophysicists including Sir Arthur Eddington and E. A. Milne.
During his tenure at Trinity, he presented two papers to the
Royal Astronomical Society. One of these presentations dealt
with the theory of white dwarf stars and how the quantum mechanical
properties of the electron dictate the behavior of these stars
at the end of their life cycle. Chandrashekhar's colleague Eddington
followed this paper with a presentation that was very critical
of Chandrashekhar's results. This attack was severe blow to Chandrashekhar's
feeling and left a life long impression on him. As a result
of the disagreement and the stature of Sir Arthur Eddington,
Chandrashekhar realized that his chances of obtaining a tenured
position at a British university were slim at best. Therefore,
in 1937, while visiting at Harvard University, he accepted a
position as a research associate at the University of Chicago
offered to him by the famous American astronomer Otto Struve.
Chandrashekhar stayed at University of Chicago through out his
career. He was named to the faculty as assistant professor in
1938. He was promoted to associate professor in 1942 and to full
professor in 1944. He became the Distinguished Service Professor
of Theoretical Astrophysics in 1947. Because of earlier disappointing
experience with Eddington, Chandrashekhar repeatedly showed his
respect for the ideas and work of his colleagues as well as his
students. His dedication to the students is well known. Two of
Chandrashekhar's students in 1947 were the doctoral candidates
Tsung-Dao Lee and Chen Ning Yang from China. Even though he maintained
his office at the Yerkes Observatory In Lake Geneva, Wisconsin,
he would regularly drive the one hundred miles to Chicago to
instruct Lee and Yang. In 1957, these two students won the Nobel
prize in Physics for their work in particle physics research.
Scientific Career
Chandrashekhar began his formal scientific
training at Presidency College in Madras, India. From the beginning,
he was interested in astrophysics and kept abreast of the latest
developments. The work of astrophysicists Sir Arthur Eddington
and Ralph Fowler on stellar evolution, or cyclesof stars, was
especially of interest to him. In 1930, after obtaining
his bachelors of science degree from Presidency College, Chandrashekhar
entered Trinity College at the University of Cambridge, England.
At about the same time he entered and won a physics competition
and was rewarded with a copy of Eddington's book " The Internal
Constitution of Stars". Chandrashekhar studied the book
at great length, leaving no detail unexamined. This process was
a mark of his lifelong habits in doing science: thoroughness,
persistence, and precise mathematical rigor. In the book, Eddington
maintained that all stars collapsed into dense Earth-sized objects
after spending their fuel supplies. This configuration of star
of a star at the end of its life cycle is known as white dwarf.
Chandrashekhar found some weakness in Eddington's arguments about
all stars becoming white dwarfs. Eddington's arguments were somewhat
qualitative and did not include the results of special relativity
and quantum physics. After applying quantum physics and relativity
to Eddington's calculations, Chandrashekhar concluded that only
stars of modest or low mass could become white dwarfs but not
the massive stars. The calculations showed that stars with masses
greater than 1.44 times mass of our own Sun would contract beyon___Ïd
the Earth-size like white dwarf to a point of even smaller sizes.
This upper limit of 1.44 time the mass of the Sun on white dwarfs
is now known as Chandrashekhar limit By 1933, Chandrashekhar
formed a complete theory of white dwarfs and decided to report
the results at a meeting of the Royal Astronomical Society .
After submitting the paper and shortly before the meeting, he
received a copy of the program. To his surprise Chandrashekhar
found that Sir Arthur Eddington is scheduled to present a paper
on the same subject, immediately following his. Even though Eddington
and Chandrashekhar had been working together and meeting regularly,
Eddington had never said anything about submitting a paper. Even
more surprising was the fact that Eddington did not say that
he was working on the same material. In his presentation, Chandrashekhar
argued that the life cycles of high mass stars ( stars above
____the Chandrashekhar limit ) " must be essentially different"
from those of the stars below the Chandrashekhar limit. From
his results, he indicated how the high mass stars might behave
towards the end of their life cycle. This logic clearly pointed
towards the eventual discovery of such phenomena as neutron stars
and black holes; the latter are so massive and so compressed
that even electromagnetic radiation can not escape the powerful
gravitational pull of the star. Eddington's presentation following
this talk was highly critical of Chandrashekhar's entire theory.
He specifically attacked the use of relativistic results and
proposed that there must exist in nature a phenomenon that would
prevent the powerful gravitational pull that exists towards the
end of the life cycle o____f high mass stars. This attack by
his colleague and a well respected astrophysicist of the day
had a life long effect on Chandrashekhar. After recovering from
the shock of this attack, Chandrashekhar examined his work carefully
and decided that he was on the right track in spite of Eddington's
criticisms. He realized that the argument between him and Eddington
was essentially in what kind of physics to apply to these compressing
stars at end of their life cycle. Prominent physicists like Niels
Bohr and Wolfgang Pauli assured Chandrashekhar privately that
he was on the right track and encouraged him. But few scientists
were willing to challenge publicly the authority of Sir Arthur
Eddington. As a result of his ongoing disagreement with
Eddington, Chandrashekhar accepted a position at the University
of Chicago in 1937, while visiting Harvard University. He stayed
at the University of Chicago for the rest of professional career.
At this point Chandrashekhar started investigating an entirely
different area of research, the dynamics of star clusters ( the
detailed motion of stars in clusters). After his usual through
work, he determined that star cluster dynamics were similar in
nature to the Brownian motion of particles suspended in liquids.
From this research he estimated the time it would take for the
clusters to have attained the present state of motion. After
many years of work, he published a definitive work, The principles
of Stellar Dynamics ( 1942). This pattern of working on a particular
subject until_publishing a definitive work and moving on to another
subject became the hallmark of Chandrashekhar's career.
During World War II, Chandrashekhar was called on to work on
the top - secret atomic weapons research going on at the University
of Chicago. During these years, he collaborated with prominent
physicists like Enrico Fermi and James Frank. These physicists
later joined the physics department at the university, adding
to its reputation as one of the leading centers in physics in
the United States. As a result, many outstanding graduate students
flocked to the physics department. Two of these students were
Tsung-Dao Lee and Chen Ning Yang who worked with Chandrashekhar.
Dedication that Chandrashekhar showed to these two students would
become pattern through out his_career. These two students won
the Nobel Prize in 1957, for their work in particle physics.
Towards the late 1940's, Chandrashekhar started his studies
on the radiative transfer in the interior of stars: the specifics
of how light energy moves and interacts with the material through
which it travels. Soon after that, he began to study the effects
of magnetism on galaxies, including the Milky Way, with special
interest on how magnetic field effects the shapes of galaxies.
Following his earlier pattern, he published a book, Hydrodynamics
and Hydromagmnetic Stability (1961 ). From 1961 to 1968, Chandrashekhar
studied equilibrium of ellipsoidal figures : the study of oblate
spheres ( spheres that bulge at the equator ), and prolate spheres
( spheres elongated like footballs ). This work provided him
with the understanding of the rotation of planets, stars, white
dwarfs, neutron stars, black holes, galaxies, and clusters of
galaxies. After the completion of this study, he published a
book, Ellipsoidal ____Figures of Equilibrium in 1969. In the
mid 1970's, Chandrashekhar went back to the study of collapsing
stars to understand a nagging detail that had been at the back
of his mind. In his famous presentation to the Royal Astronomical
Society in 1933, he had stopped short of talking about a complete
gravitational collapse of high mass stars, but a such a possibility
had already occurred to him. To understand this possibility he
concentrated his studies on the general theory of relativity
and relativistic astrophysics. This work lead to his monumental
publication of The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes in 1983.
Bibliography
- 1. James C. LoPresto, in , " The Nobel Prize Winners
Physics," edited by Frank N. Magill, Vol 3. ( Salem Press,
Pasadena, 1989 ) 1263-1270.
- 2. S. Chandrashekhar , "An Introduction to the Study
of Stellar Structure," 1939
- 3. S. Chandrashekhar ," Principles of Stellar Dynamic,"
(Dover Publication, New York, 1942)
- 4. S. Chandrashekhar , "Stochastic Problems in Physics
and Astronomy," Review of Modern Physics, Vol. 15, 1943
- 5. S. Chandrashekhar , "Radiative Transfer," 1950
- 6. S. Chandrashekhar , "Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic
Stability," ( Clarendon Press, New York, 1968)
- 7. S.Chandrashekhar , " Ellipsoidal Figures of Equilibrium,"
1969
- 8. S.Chandrashekhar , " Mathematical Theory of Black
Holes," ( Clarendon Press, New York, 1983)
- 9. H. A. Bethe, and E. E.Salpeter , " The 1983 Nobel
Prize in Physics." Science 222, ( Nov. 25, 1983), 881-885
- 10. Allen L. Hammond, editor, " A passion to Know: Twenty
Profiles in Science," (Charles Scribner's Sons, New York,
1984)
- 11. D. J. Kevles, " The Physicists: The history of a
Scientific Community in Modern America ", (Alfred A. Knopf,
New York, 1977)
- 12. G. B. Lubkin, " Nobel Prize to Chandrashekhar and
Fowler for Astrophysics." Physics Today, Vol. 37; 17-20
- 13. J. H. Weaver, "The world of Physics: A small library
of the Literature of Physics from Antiquity to the present"
( Simon & Schuster, New York, 1987)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
|